About article

Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the low back pain knowledge questionnaire.



Article type: Published article

Abstract

Background: Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire (LBP_KQ) was originally developed and validated for English speakers but not yet available for Arabic speakers.Purpose: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and test the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the LBP_KQ.Methods: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed according to recommended guidelines. Construct validity was assessed through principal component analysis, and contrasted groups including physical therapists, nurses, and patients with low back pain. Concurrent validity was assessed by the correlation of LBP_KQ with the fear avoidance-belief questionnaire and depression, anxiety, and stress scale. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest reliability using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. Sensitivity to change was measured by comparing an educational intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG).Results: The questionnaire has four components. Physical therapists had significantly (p < .001) higher LBP_KQ scores than nurses and patients indicating good construct validity. There was a significant correlation between LBP_KQ and fear avoidance-belief questionnaire total score (r = 0.200, p = .04), depression score (r = -0.219, p = .024), anxiety score (r = -0.251, p < .01), stress score (r = -0.199, p < .041). Cronbach's α was 0.662, and ICC ((2,1)) was 0.760 which reflects good reliability. There was a significant difference in LBP_KQ scores between IG and CG (p < .001) indicating sensitivity to change.Conclusion: The Arabic version of LBP_KQ is valid, reliable, and sensitive to change.


Full citation

Kanaan S, Khraise H, Almhdawi KA, Natour J, Oteir AO, Mansour ZM. Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the low back pain knowledge questionnaire. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Mar 23:1-11. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901324. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33752562.


Methodology

Methods Condition Gender Age Country Setting Sample size

Number of items

4 items

Training

Measure does not require training

Required time

Less than 5 min

Access measure

sfkanaan@just.edu.jo






© 2021 | Privacy Policy
All Rights Reserved

Notify me for new AHM projects / news


Contact Us
hsrc-ahm@pnu.edu.sa

Articles last updated: December 2020