Acronym

DFSQ

Description

The diabetic foot self-care questionnaire is considered a self-care evaluation tool with 16 questions for assessing diabetic foot health disorders.

Area of assessment

Activities of daily living, Balance, Function/disability/performance.

Condition

Metabolic /endocrine.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

CQR-A

Description

used to assess rheumatology patients' medication compliance

Area of assessment

Behavior.

Condition

Medication, Orthopedic /rheumatology.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

iPCQ

Description

Not available

Area of assessment

Function/disability/performance.

Condition

Hospital.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

iMCQ

Description

Not available

Area of assessment

Function/disability/performance.

Condition

Hospital.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

AQ

Description

The AQ (Corrigan et al., 2004) is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess attitudes, affects and behavioral intentions related to a hypothetical person diagnosed with schizophrenia, called “Harry.” The questionnaire starts with a short statement about “Harry,” a 30-year-old single man who works as a clerk in a law firm and who has been hospitalized for schizophrenia. After reading the statement, respondents rated how much they agree with each of the different items made about “Harry” on a nine-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very much). Items of the original AQ are divided into the following nine different factors, namely, responsibility, anger, pity, help, dangerousness, fear, avoidance, segregation and coercion. The AQ-21 is a shorter version, which omits terms for segregation and coercion, which have not been supported in other cross-cultural validations (Corrigan et al., 2004; Mun˜oz et al., 2015; Pingani et al., 2011). Scores for each factor are determined by summing items with a sub-score ranging from 3 to 27. Items are reversed prior to summing up for help and avoidance factors. The higher the factor’s score, the more that factor is endorsed by the respondent. Two previous confirmatory factor analyzes were used to develop the AQ measurement model and they demonstrated an acceptable fit to the hypothetical paths accounting for stigmatizing reactions (Corrigan et al., 2002).

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

COST

Description

patient‐reported outcome measure to assess financial toxicity in patients with cancer

Area of assessment

Condition

Oncology.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

CKD-SM-29

Description

to assess knowledge and self-management for chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Area of assessment

Condition

Renal.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

C-SSRS

Description

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a questionnaire used for suicide assessment developed by multiple institutions, including Columbia University, with NIMH support. The scale is evidence-supported and is part of a national and international public health initiative involving the assessment of suicidality. Available in 103 different languages, the scale has been successfully implemented across many settings, including schools, college campuses, military, fire departments, the justice system, primary care and for scientific research. Several versions of the C-CCRS have been developed for clinical practice. The Risk Assessment version is three pages long, with the initial page focusing on a checklist of all risk and protective factors that may apply. This page is designed to be completed following the client (caller) interview. The next two pages make up the formal assessment. The C-SSRS Risk Assessment is intended to help establish a person’s immediate risk of suicide and is used in acute care settings. In order to make the C-SSRS Risk Assessment available to all Lifeline centers, the Lifeline collaborated with Kelly Posner, Ph.D., Director at the Center for Suicide Risk Assessment at Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute to slightly adjust the first checklist page to meet the Lifeline’s Risk Assessment Standards. The following components were added: helplessness, feeling trapped, and engaged with phone worker.

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

ATDP

Description

This questionnaire was established in 1960 by Yuker, an American psychologist suffering from disabilityhimself and evolved until reaching its B version developed in 1966. It is a generic scale which considers Disability in a very general way without requiring knowledge of any underlying pathology. We have chosen the O form of ATDP, the ATDP score includes 20 items, each with 6 answering possibilities, on Likert scale: “completely agree”, “agree”, “ agreea little”,“ somewhat disagree”,“disagree”, or“ completely disagree ”. There is no possibility of a neutral answer. It is a forced choice, oriented towards a positive or negative appreciation of the attitude chosen in relation to the question being asked.

Area of assessment

Knowledge/attitude.

Condition

Occupation.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

OABSS

Description

The OABSS is a symptom assessment questionnaire designed to quantify OAB symptoms into a single score

Area of assessment

Condition

Renal.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

CSBS

Description

the objective of our scale is to identify instances of challenged or lacking belonging with respect to a particular context. All of our scale items are negatively worded, ascertaining the extent to which the sense of belonging is challenged rather than the extent to which it is intact.

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

OBQ11

Description

The revised occupational balance questionnaire (OBQ11) is an 11-item self-rated questionnaire for investigating a person’s perception of OB in terms of having the right amount and variation of occupations in everyday life (Håkansson et al., 2020). Each item in OBQ11 is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score thus ranges from 0 to 33 with higher scores indicating higher OB. Individual items can also be analyzed separately. Psychometric properties for OBQ including content validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability for the original OBQ were found to be good (Wagman and Håkansson, 2014a, 2014b). The OBQ11 was found to be valid and satisfied the measurement criteria defined by the Rasch model (Håkansson et al., 2020). OBQ11 is currently available in several language versions that have shown acceptable psychometric properties in preliminary studies (Günal et al., 2019; Uhrmann et al., 2018).

Area of assessment

Condition

Occupation.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

BACE

Description

the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE) scale (Clement et al., 2012), which is one of the recent scales that assesses barriers toward seeking mental health care for people with mental health problems. The scale was developed at the Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciene, King’s College London, England. The scale is composed of 30 questions representing different barriers, 12 of which are directly related to stigma. Indeed, the BACE scale is appropriate for groups of people who have contacts with mental health-care services, those who have had contacts and stopped or those avoided to have contacts as they felt discouraged due to stigma (Clement et al., 2012). Responses to the questions should indicate whether each item has stopped, delayed or discouraged the patient from seeking or continuing mental health care by choosing one of the following answers: not at all, a little, quite a lot or a lot.

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

(CWEQ-II)

Description

The Condition for Workplace Effectiveness Questionnaire-II is a 19-item tool used to measure structural empowerment among nurses. The questionnaire is divided into six subscales: opportunity, resources, information, support, formal power (job activity scale: JAS), and informal power (organization relationships scale: ORS). These subscales are measured using a 5-item Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where a higher score means better access to empowerment structures. Each subscale consists of 3 items, except for the last one (informal power), which includes four items. The overall structural empowerment is calculated by summing the scores of the six subscales. Total scores range between 6 and 30. Higher scores indicate higher perceived empowerment in the work environment. Scores from 6 to 13 represent low levels of empowerment, 14 to 22 illustrate moderate levels of empowerment, and 23 to 30 are considered high empowerment levels. Participants’ self-reported sociodemographic data included age, gender, education, experience, income, and work unit.

Area of assessment

Condition

Nursing.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

PPMI

Description

hat the Prejudice PPMI scale demonstrated a consistent 4-factor structure (fear/avoidance, malevolence, authoritarianism, &unpredictability) across three studies and in different cultural groups. Commonly used assessments of attitudes towards people with PPMI such as reported about PPMI(OMI) and Community Attitudes Toward the Mentally Ill (CAMI), did not have replicable structures. Therefore, the PPMI scale is valid by correlatingit with the CAMI scale [11] , the PPMI scale is shorter and improves psychometric characteristics [10]. Since prejudice instigma central component drives behavior, PPMI was avenue with mostly modifying for decrementing effects of those attitudes.

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

FEW

Description

The Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair (FEW) tool is a self-report questionnaire developed to measure consumers’ perceptions of how the features of their wheeled mobility and seating device support their ability to carry out their daily functions and routines independently, safely, and efficiently

Area of assessment

Condition

Occupation.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

ICIQ-OAB

Description

The ICIQ-OAB is a questionnaire for evaluating overactive bladder and related impact on quality of life (QoL) and outcome of treatment in men and women in research and clinical practice across the world. The ICIQ-OAB is derived from the fully validated ICSmale and BFLUTS questionnaires and provides a measure to assess the impact of urinary frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and nocturia symptoms.

Area of assessment

Condition

Renal.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

Not available

Description

The Fear Scale was adapted from the Champion Breast Cancer Fear Scale (CBCFS), It is an eight‐item unidimensional scale for evaluating the perceived feeling of fear associated with the thought of the coronavirus

Area of assessment

anxiety, Behavior, Depresssion.

Condition

Infectious disease.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

SWAL-QOL

Description

The SWAL-QOL is a 44-item questionnaire that is designed to assess dysphagia over 10 quality of life domains, and it has a supplemental section on symptom frequency. The 10 domains are burden, eating duration, eating desire, food selection, communication, fear, mental health, social role, fatigue, and sleep. The symptom scale includes 14 dysphagia-related symptoms: coughing, choking, gagging, and drooling. Each domain is scored on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (worst state) to 5 (best state). All scales are transformed to provide a range of 0 to 100, in which a score of “0” represents the worst score and “100” the most ideal score.

Area of assessment

Condition

Ent, Gastroenterology.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure

Acronym

EMIC

Description

EMIC is one of the valid and reliable stigma-measuring tools

Area of assessment

Condition

Psychiatric.

Age Group

Adult- over 19 years

Literature on Arabic translation/validation of measure